假的史蒂夫,揭露了

有两种错误的反应《纽约时报》揭露的假史蒂夫第一个是否认例如,TUAW埃里卡萨顿在:

我们做了一个承诺保持假史蒂夫假and we’re sticking with that promiseWe all know the news has hit the wiresAnd you know what? We don’t careWe love Fake Steve just the way he is假的。

假装他仍然是匿名不会举行假冒史蒂夫的作者丹尼尔•里昂是福布斯的编辑,现在他被孤立,福布斯是接管weblog的赞助顶部链接现在在“Forbes.com”部分的假史蒂夫的侧边栏是“视频:满足真正的假的史蒂夫·乔布斯”,里昂的音频采访被《福布斯》记者米歇尔·斯蒂尔。

希望气球从未破灭是一回事试图unpop它是另一回事。

第二个错误的反应是写假的史蒂夫在过去的时态; assuming that now that he’s been revealed, it’s over, or at the very least all downhill from here这并不一定是这样。

这个问题取决于到底是假的主要来源史蒂夫的吸引力他是那么好,有时严厉地有趣,有时非常有见地,,在他最好的,这两个? Or was it the fact that his identity was a mystery?

我说他很好当然,他的身份是未知增添了神秘感,但它只不过是一个分散注意力的工作本身如果它是假的主要来源史蒂夫的吸引力,新奇数月前就已消失。

It’s not surprising that Lyons is a published novelist; he’s created a very clever metafictional narrative, writing from a perspective where he acknowledges that he is假的史蒂夫的同时从来没有完全断裂特征真正的史蒂夫想一想,这是棘手的。1

知道作者是谁不破坏假冒史蒂夫任何超过知道剧组在总统周六夜现场它的表现才是最重要的,而不是秘密。

明显的担心,没有匿名的面具,里昂将无法执行同样的残忍但相反的是可能的现在他的身份被发现了,他有什么可失去的它不像他可以回到进行boring-ass史蒂夫·鲍尔默的采访为《福布斯》。

他可能只是让它飞。


  1. 事实上,我期望从里昂的“我已经曝出“确认假史蒂夫weblog是真正的史蒂夫的角度来看,不是假的史蒂夫如是这样的:

    So our black ops team finally found the “Secret Diary” bastard who’s been mocking me for the last yearEnds up it’s the same over-the-hill hack from Forbes who wrotethis cover storytwo years ago attacking bloggers for being mean, anonymous, unaccountable cowardsHypocrisy, have you heard of it? I was about to dispatch Moshe and the boys to pull the guy’s teeth and fingernails out but Katie said no, it’d hurt him more to leak his identity to the press.

    So I sent it over to John Markhoff at The Times, and they had it on the front page of their web site 30 minutes later, just like I askedMarkoff gave the byline and credit for the “scoop” to some sad little man named Brad Stone, who, says Markoff, has been severely depressed since losing both his testicles in some sort of masturbation accident involving a cheese graterMuch love, John, backstage passes to Tuesday’s special event are on the way.

    ↩︎