关于约翰在苹果的修改投诉代用品Mac切割的官司

周三,Groklaw帕梅拉•琼斯发表了一份报告对目前的法律之间的传奇苹果和准Mac切割的官司是什么引起了她的注意这篇文章苹果的修改投诉(PDF)反对的官司:

18On information and belief, persons other than Psystar are involved in Psystar’s unlawful and improper activities described in this Amended ComplaintThe true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, or otherwise, of these persons are unknown to AppleConsequently they are referred to herein as John Does 1 through 10 (collectively the “John Doe Defendants”)On information and belief, the John Doe Defendants are various individuals and/or corporations who have infringed Apple’s intellectual property rights, breached or induced the breach of Apple’s license agreements and violated state and common law unfair competition lawsApple will seek leave to amend this complaint to show the unknown John Doe Defendants’ true names and capacities when they are ascertained.

这是琼斯如何解释这段:

So, Apple apparently believes that somebody else is behind Psystar, which might help to explain why a major law firm would take on what seems like a fly-by-night’s case; alsowhy Psystar has been so bold在继续销售其产品I knew this thing felt funnyAs Alice in Wonderland might put it, “It gets interestinger and interestinger.”

几人(如。Macworld的吉姆Dalrymple,CNet的汤姆Krazit)采取了相同的解释——苹果宣称的官司是一个阵线或被一些邪恶的和至今未得到确诊的支持更大的鱼例如,Krazit:

It’s always been a bit puzzling to ponder how Psystar emerged seemingly overnight with designs on challenging one of the tech industry’s richest companies, retaining one of Silicon Valley’s star law firms along the wayAnd it made ambitious, expensive claims, such as attempting to argue that Apple was in violation of antitrust law by refusing to license Mac OS X.

我不买它我提出一个不同的看法:约翰谁苹果希望识别的主要贡献者OSx86项目

我不认为有什么困惑的官司只需要去做他们所做的是一对铜球认为他们会是愚蠢的,所以它没有多大意义认为有完善的公司支持的官司的努力如果它看起来像一个繁琐的可靠计划,它可能是招聘优秀的律师表明只不过官司有判断力雇佣优秀的律师。

转售通用x86计算机是很容易的,硬件是商品官司的秘密武器——获得Mac OS X上运行非苹果电脑——不是他们,而是来自OSx86项目没有OSx86项目,就不会有Mac克隆的官司从苹果的角度来看,控告Psystar的存在不一定会杜绝未经授权的Mac克隆There wouldn’t be much that would stop some other company — one not based in the U.S., say — from doing what Psystar has done.

苹果公司通过关闭OSx86项目中——或者至少关闭其主要贡献者——而不是关闭的官司。

需要澄清的是,我不知道这份文件表明,苹果是否打算大力追求获得OSx86项目成员的身份苹果的文件指出,“真正的名称或能力,无论是个人、公司、或否则,这些人都是未知的苹果”,但没有证据表明他们已知的官司。

前一: DF用具
下一个: 深绿色