沃尔特莫斯伯格（Walt Mossberg）有一个关于“缺点”的500字的部分他今天对iPad 2的评论整件事是一个缸，一个尝试的例子公平/平衡/目标通过向后弯曲找到关于设备的负面信息没有人认为iPad 2受到了批评但莫斯伯格的缺点列表中几乎没有任何内容是有效的。
Its cameras take mediocre still photos and Apple won’t even reveal their megapixel ratingsThe company says they were designed for video, not still photographyThey did capture decent video in my tests, including high-definition video from the rear camera and video good enough from the front camera for satisfying video callingBut, for a company known for quality, which bundles a new still-photo app with the device, the cameras are disappointing.
确实，图像质量至多是平庸的，并且这是第二个缺点，这是合理的但关于Apple缺乏百万像素规格 -Mossberg有iPad 2他需要做的就是拍照，将照片传输到Mac，查看尺寸，然后将宽度乘以高度这些都不是秘密。
Also, the battery life, while very good, isn’t as strong as I found it to be on the first iPadIn my tough battery test, where I played full-length movies until the battery died, with the screen brightness at about 75% and both Wi-Fi and cellular radios running, the iPad 2 just barely exceeded Apple’s claimed battery life, dying after 10 hours and nine minutesThat’s 2.5 hours better than the Xoom did on the same test, but more than an hour less than I got from the original iPad, which clocked in at 11 hours, 28 minutes.
所以莫斯伯格的第二个“缺点”是电影播放的电池续航时间 - 亮度设置为25％更高比Apple的出厂默认值 -超过苹果公司表示，9分钟即可完成10小时Apple表示你可以播放视频10小时，Mossberg可以播放10小时9分钟，这是一个缺点吗？
You can argue that it should be a “downside” because he got over 11 hours on the same test with an original iPad, but none of the other reviewers seem to be seeing a 10 percent drop in battery life for video playback between the original and new iPads我看到两者之间几乎相同的结果在Engadget的Josh Topolsky锯更好电池寿命从iPad 2比原来的。
Another drawback I encountered was that the new, more tapered design makes it harder to plug cables and accessories — including the charging cable — into the main port on the bottom of the device, because it is now angled.
我认为第一次插入电缆有点困难不是因为角度，而是因为iPad 2的30针端口看起来有点太紧了但是，后续插件要容易得多在当今平板电脑市场的竞争格局中，这个iPad 2的主要缺点是什么？
Despite being slimmer and lighter, the iPad 2 still has roughly the same length and width as the original, so it can’t compete with the Amazon Kindle, or the smaller seven-inch tablets, if you’re trying to juggle it while standing in a crowded subway.
Finally, there are two big omissions, one old and one newThe old one is that, like Apple’s prior phones and tablets, the shiny new iPad 2 still won’t play Adobe’s Flash video in its built-in Web browserThis is a deliberate decision by Apple, and puts its devices at a disadvantage for some users when compared with Android tablets, which can play Flash, or say they will soon, albeit not always well.
So the Xoom doesn’t play Flash but promises to eventually, the Galaxy Tab does but often not well, and the iPad 2’s lack of Flash is a disadvantage? No mention that there are clearly trade-offs in play就像Flash Player可能会对电池寿命产生某种影响或者iPad上缺少Flash是推动开发人员编写原生iPad应用程序的动力。
另一个遗漏与细胞数据有关The iPad 2 can’t use, or be upgraded to use, the new, faster 4G cellular-data networks being rolled out.
Apple says this is because the chips needed to do this are too immature, draining battery lifeBut the Xoom promises to be upgradeable to 4G later this year, though I have no idea how that upgrade might affect its battery life or monthly fees.
There is no evidence that Apple’s explanation is wrong, and plenty of circumstantial evidence that they’re right (like, say, the fact that the Xoom, which Motorola promised to ship with 4G, was shipped without it), but accordingly to Mossberg, the lack of 4G is a drawback.
iPad 2是一个真正的东西，明天你可以在商店购买What is Mossberg comparing the iPad to? An imaginary tablet, available today, that不have Flash Player and 4G networking, on which neither technology has an adverse effect on battery life? Why not list the lack of a quad-core processor, instead of the iPad 2’s actual dual-core one, as a drawback, too?
Mossberg’s entire review is only 1,500 words; measured by the word, a full third of what he has to say about it are these “drawbacks”相比之下，他对摩托罗拉Xoom的1,200字的评论 - 包括Mossberg在内的几乎每个人的平板电脑都表示不如iPad 2 - 包含一个62字的“缺点”。