有时真的是掩盖

布莱恩·所罗门写为《福布斯》超级的韩国“卡拉ok /护送酒吧”丑闻:

If true, that incident would be bad enough, but it appears to have emerged solely due to Uber’s attempts to cover it upAccording to Holzwarth, Emil Michael called her three weeks ago as the news about Uber’s workplace culture became a full-fledged scandal. Michael allegedly asked her not to speak to the press and to pretend the visit was simply to a regular karaoke bar.From The Information:

当奥Michael called, he told her that “things have been really rough out here,” referring to Uber’s issuesHe then said, “Remember that night in Korea?” There are reporters, he said, who will try to “break the story and I just want to go over things with youWe just went to a karaoke bar and that’s all that happened, right?”

这不是犯罪,掩盖”是一种陈词滥调,但在这种情况下这是真的我没有强调在我第一篇文章关于这个事件我认为:

就我个人而言,我认为这些机构是道德上的。

我知道亚洲文化与美国不同文化,我知道亚洲文化的一部分——在韩国肯定是“做生意”这样的机构但信息的故事没有说这个超级高管与韩国人“做生意”他们是一群美国人在自己,所以韩国的文化规范并不相关。

这里,最重要的是,真正的问题是埃米尔迈克尔问加Holzwarth谎报事件这是令人发指的它应该考虑解雇即使你个人认为这些“卡拉ok /护航”关节是完美的除了是错误的事情,道德,这也是令人难以置信的愚蠢,因为Holzwarth告诉的信息她提出了这个故事的原因是她很愤怒(理应如此),迈克尔的请求,她撒谎事件:

“I’m not going to lie for them,” she said in an interview with The Information this weekIn the interview, she described Mr. Kalanick as “part of a class of privileged men who have been taught they can do whatever they want, and now they can.”

She said she wouldn’t have considered speaking publicly had Mr. Michael not attempted to “silence” her.

我能看到的理由保持个人谴责高管做奇妙的工作我不是说我同意实际上,我不我只是说我看到的逻辑我看不见的逻辑保持个人谴责高管会做些什么愚蠢的——不仅仅是错误的但是愚蠢的——就像调用一个前同事告诉她向媒体撒谎,如果问。